National Society of Professional Engineers
January 2011 - Posts - Mentoring Blog

January 2011 - Posts

Professionalism and the Four-Way Test

By Chris Knutson, P.E.

Although it’s been around since 1932, the Rotary International’s “Four-Way Test” was entirely unknown to me until I read it this past week hanging on the wall of my son’s Tai-Kwon-Do studio. For those not familiar with it, the Four-Way Test is a code of ethics adopted by Rotary and consists of the following four questions:

1. Is it the truth?
2. Is it fair to all concerned?
3. Will it build goodwill and better friendships?
4. Will it be beneficial to all concerned?

Reading these words made me think of my engineering profession and my professional obligations in my current role as an officer and commander. Each of these virtues I recognized as absolutely essential to my success and the success and well-being of those who rely on my leadership and support—my family, my squadron, my colleagues, and my clients.

Although these virtues likely have subtle differences in meaning to each of us, let’s take a quick look at how they stack up against a code that may be a bit more recognizable to those reading this post: the NSPE Code of Ethics Fundamental Canon’s.

Is it truthful?
Canon #3: Issue public statements only in a objective and truthful manner.
Canon #5: Avoid deceptive acts.

Is it fair to all concerned?
Canon #4: Act for each employer or client as faithful agents or trustees.

Will it build goodwill and better friendships?
Canon #2: Perform services only in areas of their competence.
Canon #6: Conduct themselves honorably, responsibly, ethically, and lawfully so as to enhance the honor, reputation, and usefulness of the profession.

Will it be beneficial to all concerned?
Canon #1: Hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public.

For most of us, the Fundamental Canons, and perhaps Rotary’s Four-Way Test, are always playing in the background whether we are conscious of them or not. For certain, a successful professional absolutely needs to have these virtues running as source operating language or derailment is certain to befall them.

However, I invite you to join me in consciously reflecting on how these virtues benefit each of us individually and collectively as a profession. This conscious reflection is a worthwhile exercise for 2011.

NSPE member Chris Knutson, P.E., has over 17 years in the U.S. Air Force as an engineer officer and currently serves as a lieutenant colonel commanding a civil engineer squadron in New Mexico. He is a member of the NSPE Mentoring Task Force.

Mentoring: Be. Know. Do.

By Chris Knutson, P.E.

An enduring expression of leadership for the U.S. Army has been BE, KNOW, DO. The framework has been used for years to focus the development of leaders at West Point and has been formalized within the Army’s official leadership doctrine. The focus is not so much on the mechanics of leadership as it is on the development of leadership characteristics. This framework can be applied to all leadership situations in any organization, not just the military. Furthermore, it can be applied to the mentor/mentee relationship where skill and knowledge are co-developed.

Be. Perhaps it’s most useful to think of this as the values and attributes that shape character. These are the internal and defining qualities possessed at all times and that make up a person’s identity. As a mentor, you are expected to be role model with proper conduct both in and out of the office. Proper conduct includes proper attitudes, behaviors, and decisions both professionally and personally. You cannot pick and choose when to adhere to the code of ethics and other professional requirements—this is the price of entry into our profession. As a mentee, you must be perceptive to whom you follow or where you turn for professional advice. Not all advice is useful, and it is your job to know this and cut through the static.

Know. At first blush this element is simple. It’s about knowledge: university and continuing education, on-the-job training, experiences. However, it goes a step further for the mentor and mentee relationship. The mentor is expected to maintain personal familiarity with the mentee as well as with the guidelines and framework for mentoring from their company, NSPE, or other governing entity. The latter two elements ensure that the relationship is (1) relevant to the mentee’s professional aspirations and current ability set and (2) conducted within a framework that will yield an effective relationship.

Do. While character and knowledge are good, they themselves are not enough for a mentee to advance. It will take action—action on behalf of the mentee in applying the knowledge and wisdom gained from observing their mentor in action and the knowledge they have imparted. Action is equally important for the mentor, who must “walk the talk.” Since a large part of mentoring is accomplished nonverbally through observation, competency, and diligence in every action taken will send the right signals to the mentee with greater impact than through words alone.

Applying the Army’s simple BE, KNOW, DO framework to our mentoring relationships can help both the mentor and mentee remember the basic elements necessary for a successful partnership. It can also help highlight what is right and links knowledge to action.

NSPE member Chris Knutson, P.E., has over 17 years in the U.S. Air Force as an engineer officer and currently serves as a lieutenant colonel commanding a civil engineer squadron in New Mexico. He is a member of the NSPE Mentoring Task Force.

Posted by William J. Bezdek, P.E. | with no comments
Filed under: